In an astonishing new poll taken last year by
YouGov, an astonishing 41% of Americans – including 51% of Democrats –
support criminalizing “hate speech”. In
the poll, such a hate speech law would "make it a crime for people to make
public comments intended to stir up hatred against a group based on such things
as their race, gender, religion, ethnic origin, or sexual orientation.”
While this sounds nice to the sensibilities of the average liberal progressive,
it spells a certain threat to our freedom of speech as spelled out in the First
Amendment, and potentially the end of this essential freedom enjoyed in our
country for over 200 years. “Hate
speech” is, of course, highly subjective and is what progressives call any
speech that doesn’t support their narrative and world view, whether the speech
is true or not.
It’s something that Hillary Clinton has shown repeatedly that she would
make a priority in her term as president, should she pull off winning the
presidency in 2016. Like all
totalitarians, she will “stand up” for the rights of society’s “victims” by
criminalizing free speech that she and her liberal supporters find offensive -
and jail those who dare to cross the line.
The First Amendment is a nuisance to far-Left ideologues like Hillary
Clinton, who view our belief in individual freedom and the right of self
expression as a crime against their progressive ideals of an ordered
society. It’s a reason the Left
distains our Constitution with such vigor, labeling it outdated, racist,
primitive and irrelevant in today’s multicultural society. Never mind that the values enshrined in our
Constitution have given rise to greatest – and most free – society in history,
free speech is just too offensive for those who want to mute us in the name of
“fairness and equality”.
It’s a worthy price for the goal of a progressive utopia here in America,
right?
A few cases in point, in case there is any doubt about Hillary’s true
agenda:
While
Clinton was Secretary of State under Obama, she championed the Organization of
Islamic Conference (OIC) -backed United Nations Human Rights Commission Resolution 16/18,
which calls for “combating intolerance, negative stereotyping and
stigmatization of, and discrimination, incitement to violence, and violence
against persons based on religion or belief.”
Of
course, the member states of the OIC ignore the UN’s Declaration of Human
Rights outright in favor of their own, anti-human rights Islamic declaration,
subject to Sharia (Islamic) law which bans all criticism of Islam, its laws and
its prophet, under penalty of imprisonment, torture or death. This resolution is nothing short of forcing
sharia compliance worldwide, and Hillary Clinton supports it wholeheartedly.
This
Resolution 16/18 effectively requires that countries pass laws criminalizing
“Islamophobia”. The OIC is set on making
it an enforceable crime for non-Muslim people anywhere globally —including here
in America —to say anything about Islam that Islamic law does not permit.
This
includes even true speech about Islam.
Just ask Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff, a Viennese housewife and anti-Jihad
activist, who was charged and arrested under Austria’s criminal code for
"denigrating religious beliefs" after giving a series of seminars
about the dangers of radical Islam - the kind of criminal code that Hillary
would love to import here into the United States. The Austrian judge ruled that
Sabaditsch-Wolff committed a crime by stating in her seminars about Islam that
the prophet Mohammed was a pedophile – even though the Koran and other Islamic
texts clearly show that he married a young girl at 6 and consummated the
marriage (had sex) with her when she was only 9 - and he was 54. Shockingly,
the truth is no defense in hate speech cases like this.
Filmmaker
Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, maker of “Innocence of the Muslims”, a video falsely
blamed by Obama and Hillary on the 2012 Benghazi terror attack that killed four
Americans, was jailed as promised, when Hillary is reported to have personally
vowed to “make sure that the person who made that film ["Innocence of
Muslims"] is arrested and prosecuted.”
She
upheld her support of Resolution 15/18 by supporting Sharia law compliance concerning
the anti-blasphemy provisions in the law in this case. Hillary was more consumed with gagging the
free speech rights of the filmmaker than finding the terrorists who killed four
Americans.
Clinton
has also fought against political free speech, with her support for the
overturning of the Citizens United decision which struck down a ban on
political expenditures by corporations and unions, with the Supreme Court arguing
that the ban violated the First Amendment protection of free speech.
Once
again, that pesky Constitutional protection of free speech is getting in the
way of Hillary’s agenda for our country.
While, according to Clinton, it should be illegal for billionaires to
use their First Amendment rights of free speech to influence elections, it’s
completely fine with Hillary to receive hundreds of millions of dollars directly
from billionaires – and foreign governments with horrendous human rights
records – to fund the unaccountable Clinton Foundation. It’s the predictable progressive
double-standard once again at work.
Hillary
has been consistent with respect to her positions on limiting free speech here
in the US, and like the 51% of Americans who want to criminalize “hate speech”,
she forgets that the greatness of our country – and the Western world – depends
on the right of free expression and dissenting speech. It’s called the FIRST Amendment for a
reason, because freedom of speech is our first and most important birthright
that the very survival of our republic depends on. Holding such positions should immediately
disqualify Hillary – or any other candidate – from the presidency, because their
first and foremost duty of the president is swearing to protect and preserve
the Constitution of the United States, not shredding it as Hillary will
certainly find a way to do if she manages wins the office.
Feel free to leave your comments!
ReplyDeleteOh hell no! This is our first amendment right to free speech! If they take away our first amendment right how many more will they strip is of? Liberal idiots don't have the since God gave a pissant! How many more agree with me?
ReplyDeleteGreat point Elizabeth!
DeleteBe sure to follow me for more blog posts that may interest you!
Delete